Another earnings season has now come and gone. Detailed commentary on all 24 reports can be found on my Substack. After reading through the results of all 24 positions, here are the key takeaways:

Revolve Group continues to shine. This quarter, its top line results beat expectations by 14% with 58% revenue growth posted vs. the most recent pre-pandemic period. The company named Kendall Jenner — arguable the most ubiquitous fashion icon on Planet Earth — as its FWRD brands’s new creative director. Her fashion clout is already paying dividends with the brand taking market share from formidable peers.

Despite Revolve catering to fancier, going out clothing and the pandemic severely impacting that demand, it managed through admirably with briskly expanding margins. Its core marketing channel — live events — was also halted amid the pandemic yet it still executed. It’s now taking advantage of the demand recovery with remarkable success. Not only that, but Revolve is also maintaining market share gains in the pandemic categories that it pivoted to last year.

It crushed all of its profit and margin estimates and reported zero supply chain issues while countless other retail players struggled with logistics. How? Revolve’s management leaned on its internal inventory system to observe consumer activity and predict these supply chain issues 9 months ago — it was able to prepare accordingly. Now, the firm is seamlessly capturing rapidly growing demand as our world slowly normalizes. This was yet another elite quarter for the company.

Subscribe now

The following companies modestly exceeded expectations while also raising guidance:

The following companies reported results that either exceeded expectations with no further guidance raises or roughly met expectations and guidance:

I approach investing with a unique set of life circumstances that shape my risk posture and investment horizon. Personal aspects such as not having dependents and being in my early 20’s account for this. As a result, I have a strong stomach for prudent, diversified risk.

This all contributes to my objective to seek out young disruptors with the potential to delver life-changing returns. This lucrative upside also coincides with a higher-than-normal probability of being a failed investment — I accept that. Your different circumstances could call for a different approach.

How am I so comfortable with occasionally making bad picks and incurring the coinciding losses? A few notes on this. First, the potential profit structure of public equities makes imperfection entirely okay. The coveted “10 bagger” everyone seeks out can work wonders in more than making up for several losers. Finite downside and infinite upside is a wonderful thing — slugging percentage matters much more than batting average here. Similarly to private equity or venture capital, this approach frees me to do exceptionally well while simultaneously being wrong on numerous occasions.

Secondly, accepting some failure as inevitable is a large part of the battle. Humility goes a long way here and without it — markets will humble us all in a hurry. When we expect perfection, we leave ourselves vulnerable to over-indulging or over-allocating into high conviction names. Over-allocation is the antithesis of good diversification and is a great way to get hurt.

To combat this tendency, I have instituted a rule that I will never invest more than 4% of my wealth into any single name. No matter how certain I am about a holding, I will never put in more than that. That feature of infinite potential upside discussed above means that’s all I need.

I plan to publish an article on my overarching investment philosophy in the coming weeks. After that is published, it will be linked to this section of all future portfolio updates and updated as the process evolves.

Subscribe now

My cash position fluctuates between 5%-20% of total holdings as cycles of fear and greed play out in stock markets. As excessive fear and multiple compression sweeps up thriving companies, I slowly accumulate. This accumulation is not uniform but instead dictated by company performance and valuation.

For example, multiple compression does not appeal to me for a company like Butterfly that isn’t succeeding or meeting expectations as a company.

For a company like Lemonade — that is thriving but also peaked at a ridiculous valuation of roughly 80X sales — I do look to accumulate into multiple compression but I widen the amount of said compression needed to do so. The Trade Desk is in a similar boat for me but the stock continues to outperform so I continue to simply hold.

For a company like Progyny that I perceive to be both affordable and thriving — I more aggressively accumulate into multiple compression. It’s at these times when my cash position generally falls towards 5% (at a snail’s pace) as I use the liquidity to take advantage of enhanced risk-reward.

Conversely, as excessive mania, greed and multiple expansion drags markets higher, I slowly trim. It’s at these times when my cash position rises to re-load my toolkit to take advantage of future pullbacks and opportunities. I am always predominately invested in markets, but I do use macro signals and market sentiment/conditions to trim and add around my permanent positions.

For this cycle of fear, I plan to continue slowly allocating more and more cash. As I/if I approach 5%-6% cash I will likely consider selling holdings like Microsoft and Planet Fitness trading at historically rich valuations to add more flexibility. We shall see if we get there.

I cannot time market bottoms. I can — however — free myself to slowly accumulate into more turbulence as it comes if I continue to do 2 things:

I pause adding to names that are fundamentally underperforming to give the companies a chance to right the ship — I call this being on the hot seat like a coach in jeopardy of losing their job. If poor execution endures, I sell the position. Here is my list of the holdings in that grouping:

For more mature names in my portfolio, I usually reach a point where I consider my position full. At that time I stop accumulating shares into stock price pain and simply hold. Here is my list of the holdings in that grouping:

When my holdings are fundamentally thriving but the stocks are lagging, I use this as an opportunity to slowly accumulate more shares. Here is my list of the holdings currently in that grouping:

Below are my forecasted fair value and compounded annual return estimates for all holdings (besides pre-revenue Nanox). I aggregated data from historical results, comparable firms and industry research to arrive at these values — which should all be taken with a large grain of salt. The amount of assumptions that go into stock forecasting make the process inherently inaccurate — actual results will surely differ from my projections. This merely paints a picture of where I think my holdings can be in five years if things go relatively well. I tried to be pessimistic with growth and margin assumptions.

As always, please reach out to me with any remaining questions. I will continue to post updated portfolio summaries after each earnings season as I use these filings as progress reports to gauge recent performance.